Prabhu M. K.
11-05-2008, 05:56 AM
Hi Jesse,
These domains are not listed in Google Apps. Let me check with SRV record.
Regards,
Prabhu M.K
> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:08:19 -0600
> From: Jesse Thompson <jesse.thompson (AT) doit (DOT) wisc.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Operators] Gtalk Server-Server Federation -
> Not-Authorized
> To: XMPP Operators Group <operators (AT) xmpp (DOT) org>
> Message-ID: <490F3003.8 (AT) doit (DOT) wisc.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > Prabhu M. K. wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> We have our OMA based IM server with XMPP interface connecting Gtalk
> server.
> >>
> >> Is the SRV record mandatory for XMPP? We have some other domain which
> >> works with Gtalk-XMPP server without SRV record.
> >
> > No, it is not mandatory.
> >
> > It is odd that one of your domains works but the other does not. Are
> > they both deployed using the same software?
>
> Check to see if the domain is activated in Google Apps. If the domain
> has no SRV records, then Google will assume ownership of chat for the
> domain.
>
> Jesse
>
These domains are not listed in Google Apps. Let me check with SRV record.
Regards,
Prabhu M.K
> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:08:19 -0600
> From: Jesse Thompson <jesse.thompson (AT) doit (DOT) wisc.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Operators] Gtalk Server-Server Federation -
> Not-Authorized
> To: XMPP Operators Group <operators (AT) xmpp (DOT) org>
> Message-ID: <490F3003.8 (AT) doit (DOT) wisc.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > Prabhu M. K. wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> We have our OMA based IM server with XMPP interface connecting Gtalk
> server.
> >>
> >> Is the SRV record mandatory for XMPP? We have some other domain which
> >> works with Gtalk-XMPP server without SRV record.
> >
> > No, it is not mandatory.
> >
> > It is odd that one of your domains works but the other does not. Are
> > they both deployed using the same software?
>
> Check to see if the domain is activated in Google Apps. If the domain
> has no SRV records, then Google will assume ownership of chat for the
> domain.
>
> Jesse
>